Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Eur J Ophthalmol ; 32(5): 3012-3018, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1551160

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To assess the distribution pattern of aerosol in the aspect of time and direction during the intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement by air-puff non-contact tonometer (NCT) and further offer references for protection from coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) in the routine ophthalmic examination. METHOD: A single-center observational study was conducted in the ophthalmology clinics of Peking University Third Hospital. Two air quality detectors were equipped to assess the generated particulate matter (PM) concentration simultaneously within 30 s after IOP measurement in the outpatient hall. Detector A was fixed next to the NCT as a reference, while Detector B was fixed 1 meter away. The participants were divided into two groups depending on the position of Detector B. The generation of aerosol was compared within different groups and time intervals. RESULTS: 144 participants were enrolled in the final analysis. At a 1 m distance from the NCT, the PM2.5 concentration significantly increased at the 30 s (Z = 2.898, Bonferroni-corrected P = 0.038) while the PM10 concentration increased immediately after the IOP measurement (Z = 2.967, Bonferroni-corrected P = 0.030). The PM2.5 and PM10 concentrations at 1 m were significantly higher immediately (Z = -2.183, P = 0.029; Z = -2.502, P = 0.012) and 30 s (Z = -2.021, P = 0.043; Z = -2.071, P = 0.038) after the IOP measurements when the Detector B was vertical to the air jet on the lateral side. CONCLUSIONS: NCT may produce aerosol after the IOP measurement by air-puff. The generated PM2.5 had a prolonged existence compared with PM10 at a 1 m distance. The lateral side of the air-puff direction may be of higher exposure risk to aerosol.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Tonometry, Ocular , COVID-19/epidemiology , Humans , Intraocular Pressure , Particulate Matter , Respiratory Aerosols and Droplets , Tonometry, Ocular/methods
2.
Semin Ophthalmol ; 36(4): 310-314, 2021 May 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1125541

ABSTRACT

Technological advances provide a number of options for glaucoma monitoring outside the office setting, including home-based tonometry and perimetry. This has the potential to revolutionize management of this chronic disease, improve access to care, and enhance patient engagement. Here, we provide an overview of existing technologies for home-based glaucoma monitoring. We also discuss areas for future research and the potential applications of these technologies to telemedicine, which has been brought to the forefront during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological/trends , Glaucoma/diagnosis , Monitoring, Ambulatory , Telemedicine/trends , Telemetry/instrumentation , Biomedical Technology/trends , Glaucoma/physiopathology , Humans , Intraocular Pressure/physiology , Ophthalmology/trends , Self Care/methods , Tomography, Optical Coherence/methods , Tonometry, Ocular/methods , Visual Field Tests/methods
3.
Ophthalmol Glaucoma ; 4(5): 447-453, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-997378

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate in glaucoma patients the feasibility and use of remote monitoring of intraocular pressure (IOP) with an implanted telemetry sensor during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) lockdown. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: Patients previously implanted with a telemetric IOP sensor (Eyemate; Implandata GmbH) were included. METHODS: Intraocular pressure measurements acquired by the patients during the lockdown were collected by physicians who were located remotely. A questionnaire was sent to 10 participating study centers to evaluate the clinical impact of remote monitoring of IOP via the IOP sensor system. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of patients who obtained home IOP measurements. RESULTS: Data were available from all centers and from 37 eyes of 37 patients (16 patients with a sulcus-based sensor and 21 patients with a suprachoroidal sensor). Thirty-four patients obtained IOP measurements during the lockdown. Mean age of the patients was 69.3 ± 9.6 years, and 48.6% were women. A total of 8415 IOP measurements from 370 measurement days were obtained. Based on remote IOP measurements, treatment was changed in 5 patients. In another 5 patients, treatment change was considered when physicians received the IOP measurements after the lockdown. Nine of the 10 study centers judged remote IOP measurements to have a clinical impact. CONCLUSIONS: These results show the feasibility of patient-acquired measurement of IOP in conjunction with remote IOP monitoring by physicians with an implantable sensor. The data obtained impacted clinical decision making, including adjustment of ocular hypotensive therapy and avoiding unnecessary office visits during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Disease Transmission, Infectious/prevention & control , Glaucoma/diagnosis , Intraocular Pressure/physiology , Pandemics , Telemetry/methods , Tonometry, Ocular/methods , Comorbidity , Cross-Sectional Studies , Equipment Design , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Glaucoma/epidemiology , Glaucoma/physiopathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Switzerland/epidemiology , United Kingdom/epidemiology
4.
J Glaucoma ; 30(3): 223-226, 2021 03 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-960618

ABSTRACT

PRECIS: A drive-through clinic was created to obtain intraocular pressure measurements before a virtual visit with their provider, in order to provide care for patients in the Kellogg Glaucoma Clinic while minimizing risk of COVID-19 transmission. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to establish a drive-through clinic model to provide glaucoma care for patients while minimizing the risk of COVID-19 transmission. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A drive-through clinic was created by adapting a 1-lane, 1-way driveway adjacent to the Kellogg Eye Center building entrance. Patients were physicianselected from the Glaucoma Clinic at Kellogg Eye Center as existing patients who required intraocular pressure (IOP) checks and therapeutic management and were chosen based on their ability to be managed with an IOP measurement primarily. The entrance was otherwise closed to the public, allowing staff to utilize an adjacent vestibule with glass walls and sliding doors as a staffroom. Patients were instructed to arrive within a 15-minute time window at which time they would drive through the lane and stop their cars under an awning over the driveway. Ophthalmic technicians wearing appropriate personal protective equipment then approached each car, confirmed patient information, and measured IOP. Once the data were recorded using a mobile workstation, the physician was able to complete each visit by discussing the findings and therapeutic plan with the patient, either in-person in real time or virtually by phone or video visit at a later time. RESULTS: A total of 241 visits were completed over 14 half day clinic sessions, with number of drive-through visits ranging from 5 to 45 per session. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to institute a drive-through model of IOP checks for glaucoma patients which is efficient and minimizes the risk of exposure to COVID-19 for patients and staff.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Disease Transmission, Infectious/prevention & control , Glaucoma/diagnosis , Intraocular Pressure/physiology , Pandemics , Tonometry, Ocular/methods , COVID-19/transmission , Comorbidity , Glaucoma/epidemiology , Glaucoma/physiopathology , Humans , SARS-CoV-2
5.
J Glaucoma ; 30(3): e47-e49, 2021 03 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-960617

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has impacted ophthalmology practices significantly. American Academy of Ophthalmology and Center for Disease Control guidelines suggest mandatory masking of patients and physicians during outpatient visits. We have recently become aware of a mask-induced phenomenon, whereby the intraocular pressure (IOP) as measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) is artificially elevated due to mechanical interference from the mask. CLINICAL PRESENTATION: A 37-year-old male with a history of primary open-angle glaucoma on triple therapy presented for a routine visit. CLINICAL FINDINGS: When measuring IOP by GAT the right eye measured 16 mm Hg, but the left eye measured 20 mm Hg. The patient's mask was noted to be touching the base of the sensor rod on the tonometer. This patient's IOP was falsely elevated due to the lateral edge of his mask touching the base of the applanation tonometer, changing the relationship between the bi-prism tip and the weighted balance below, and eliminating the weighted balance from the pressure measuring mechanism. The patient's mask was adjusted to ensure there was no touch and repeat measurement showed an IOP of 16 mm Hg in the left eye. CONCLUSION: Recognizing mask-induced alteration in IOP is essential as it could lead to unnecessary escalation of treatment. We recommend flattening the area of mask protrusion during applanation and ensuring that the sensor arm remains clear of the mask while the tonometer tip approaches the cornea, especially at the moment the mires become visible during corneal contact.


Subject(s)
Artifacts , COVID-19/epidemiology , Glaucoma, Open-Angle/physiopathology , Intraocular Pressure/physiology , Masks , Respiration, Artificial/instrumentation , Tonometry, Ocular/methods , Adult , COVID-19/therapy , Comorbidity , Glaucoma, Open-Angle/diagnosis , Glaucoma, Open-Angle/epidemiology , Humans , Male , SARS-CoV-2
6.
PLoS One ; 15(10): e0240421, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-841648

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the microbial loading in aerosols produced after air-puff by non-contact tonometer (NCT) as well as the effect of alcohol disinfection on the inhibition of microbes and thus to provide suggestions for the prevention and control of COVID-19 in ophthalmic departments of hospitals or clinics during the great pandemics. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was carried out in this study. A NIDEK NCT was used for intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement for patients who visited Department of Ophthalmology in Qilu Hospital of Shandong University during March 18-25 2020. After ultra-violate (UV) light disinfection, the room air was sampled for 5 minutes. Before and after alcohol disinfection, the air samples and nozzle surface samples were respectively collected by plate exposure method and sterile moist cotton swab technique after predetermined times of NCT air-puff. Microbial colony counts were calculated after incubation for 48 hours. Finally, mass spectrometry was performed for the accurate identification of microbial species. RESULTS: Increased microbial colonies were detected from air samples close to NCT nozzle after air-puff compared with air samples at a distance of 1 meter from the nozzle (p = 0.001). Interestingly, none microbes were detected on the surface of NCT nozzle. Importantly, after 75% alcohol disinfection less microbes were detected in the air beside the nozzle (p = 0.003). Microbial species identification showed more than ten strains of microbes, all of which were non-pathogenic. CONCLUSION: Aerosols containing microbes were produced by NCT air-puff in the ophthalmic consultation room, which may be a possible virus transmission route in the department of ophthalmology during the COVID-19 pandemic. Alcohol disinfection for the nozzle and the surrounding air was efficient at decreasing the microbes contained in the aerosols and theoretically this prevention measure could also inhibit the virus. This will give guidance for the prevention of virus transmission and protection of hospital staff and patients.


Subject(s)
Air Microbiology , Alcohols/chemistry , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Disinfectants/chemistry , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Tonometry, Ocular/methods , Aerosols/chemistry , Betacoronavirus/physiology , COVID-19 , China/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Hospitals , Humans , Ophthalmology/methods , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2
7.
Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol ; 27(2): 73-78, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-714534

ABSTRACT

The novel coronavirus disease COVID-19 caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) has resulted in a substantial change in eye care and clinical practice. There has been conflicting information and weak evidence on the virus's transmission through tears. Yet, virus detection on cornea and conjunctiva surface as a gateway for infection is not well-studied. Moreover, there have been no reported cases of SARS-CoV-2 transmission through tonometry to date. Thus, this uncertainty has urged this review on evidence-based guidelines and recommendations on tonometer use in the COVID-19 era. The aim of this article is to provide ophthalmologists with recommendations for tonometry practice based on current evidence and best practice guidelines.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/transmission , Glaucoma/diagnosis , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/transmission , Tonometry, Ocular/methods , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Conjunctiva/virology , Cornea/virology , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Disinfection , Equipment Reuse , Humans , Ophthalmology , Pandemics/prevention & control , Personal Protective Equipment , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Practice Guidelines as Topic , SARS-CoV-2 , Tears/virology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL